Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Toby Martin vs Philip Henning Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martin vs Henning analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Toby Martin vs Philip Henning Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin 0 - 0 Henning
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martin has won 50.12% of points on their second serve, while Henning has won 57.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martin, in recent form, has won 53.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Henning has won 54.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.24% and 35.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martin has saved 55.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Henning has saved 60.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martin has won 57.69% of matches played (W/L 30/ 22), with Henning winning 85.25% (W/L 52/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 160/ 140), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 12/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Martin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 30/ 22), where as Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.25% of matches (W/L 52/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martin has played against opponents with an average rank of 66.06 while Henning has played against players with an average rank of 114.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martin has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Henning has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martin has converted 44.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Henning has converted 46.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
896
Rank
641
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
445
Rank
445
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
52% (315-290)
Career Total W/L
80% (61-15)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
85% (29-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
4
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Toby Martin vs Philip Henning For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Martin VS Henning
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Toby Martin | Philip Henning |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 85% (29/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (31/23) | 77% (60/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (278/243) | 59% (438/303) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 89% (17/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 80% (12/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 123 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:2 | 1:43:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.64 | 106.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (817/1249) | 68% (1510/2225) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (520/817) | 71% (1072/1510) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (216/431) | 57% (410/715) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (62/139) | 47% (124/264) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (557/1314) | 43% (1024/2400) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (14/11) | 85% (29/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 85% (29/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 75% (9/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 92% (26/24) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 8% (26/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 63% (8/5) |
Toby Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Aryan Shah
Player
Toby Martin
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
James Beaven
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Toby Martin
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Oskar Brostrom Poulsen
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Toby Martin
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve %
30%
(
3 of
10)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Toby Martin
70%
(
96 of
138)
1st Serve %
65%
(
84 of
129)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
52 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
129)
133
Total Points Won
134
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
George Houghton
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Philip Henning
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Alec Beckley
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Alexander Donski
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
John Bothma
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Reuben De Klerk
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Maik Steiner
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Vs Henning Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Martin are available here and Henning photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
